Depth of field is a constant consideration. I photographed these Siberian tigers in China on one of my photo tours with a 500mm f/4 telephoto, and as you can see one of the cats was slightly behind the other one. That meant that in order to get both sharp, I had to use a fairly small aperture because long lenses have such shallow depth of field. I chose f/11, but it wasn't enough. The tiger in the lower part of the composition is just a little bit soft and that's not acceptable. The reason I couldn't see how much of the image was sharp was because it was so cold -- minus 35 degrees Celsius (at minus 40 both Fahrenheit and Celsius are the same) -- and the LCD on my Canon 5D Mark III was completely covered in ice. My warm breath froze on the glass and I was essentially shooting blind. In retrospect, I should have raised the ISO and used f/22. My settings for this were 1/1000, f/11, and 640 ISO. I like the photo a lot, but it's not perfect.
4 Comments
Feb 11, 2017, 4:45:57 PM
Jim - Rosemary, Yes, I am. But almost sharp doesn't count.
Feb 11, 2017, 1:12:38 PM
Rosemary Sheel - Wow! Are you picky! It looks good to me. But if I were dissatisfied, I'd just soften the top tiger to match the bottom one!
Feb 11, 2017, 8:08:21 AM
Jim - Janie, remember that I have the original and I can enlarge it on my monitor to see minute detail.
Feb 11, 2017, 4:15:01 AM
janie Greene - It looks great to me!!!! Their eyes all look in focus..what did you use to look at this, a huge magnifying glass???????His wiskers look in focus...guess my eyes just are not as sharp as yours...Jg